Log in

No account? Create an account
Steve Likes to Curse
Writing, comics and random thoughts from really a rather vulgar man
They grow up so fast 
Saturday, July 5th, 2008 | 08:26 pm [personal]
Today this humble haven of filth is two years old. I got myself a LiveJournal account on July 5, 2006 to publish a review I’d written of Superman Returns, and I’ve posted at least one article a day, every day for the last two years. I don’t say that to brag, just to reflect on what a blast it’s been.
The blog has been a valued and cathartic creative outlet for me, where I’ve been able to comment on current events, make fun of famous people I don’t like in a very mean-spirited way, and post the occasional dirty Star Trek comic (this most recent one is my favorite from the last year, I think). For that alone, I owe it a great deal. But it’s also put me in touch with people from all over the world, with whom I’ve had some fun and eye-opening conversations.
This past year has been especially good for that, as I finally managed to piss enough people off to generate some regular comments on my shit. The article I wrote about the poor science education given to many children in religious homeschools has drawn more of a response to the blog than anything I’ve ever written, and not only sent waves of opposition my way from defensive fundamentalist Christians, but also introduced to me a large segment of secular homeschoolers, like Dawn from Day By Day Discoveries, or religious homeschoolers who chose to teach their children genuine science rather than the creationist drivel espoused by the Apologia textbooks.
In the last few months, I’ve also been able to experience the indescribable feeling of being called a statist. Though it doesn’t make me feel too special — from the fuzzy definition of that term I’ve inferred from the responses of this particular anonymous commenter, pretty much everyone I know is a statist, too.
Thanks to everyone who has ever taken the time from their day to read this blog, and special thanks to all of you who have ever taken a few minutes to write a comment on something I’ve written. Having somewhere to post my profane, impious, irreverent rantings and ravings is pretty fucking sweet, but getting to meet (in a sense) all of you is what’s really made it a helluva lot of fun.
See y’all tomorrow.
Sunday, July 6th, 2008 | 08:11 am (UTC)
Kids, I love this man. I was too lazy to write my annual blog entry of my favorite blog entries from this past year, but you can bet your sweet bippy that yes, I smile upon many choice posts, and yes, I have heard or read damn near all 365 posts over the past 52 weeks. (And seriously, he's not nearly as conceited as he seems. I know it's hard to believe, seeing as he writes a daily journal with the assumption that other people are parched for his quenchifying knowledge, but you'll just have to trust me on this one, folks.)

With love,
Your Whoa-man

(P.S. ***NOTE TO THE FREQUENT COMMENTER STEVE REFERS TO IN THE ABOVE ENTRY*** FYI, Steve's a total closet statist. I shouldn't really be posting this, but he gets paid under the table by the government to write this blog to further their agenda. He heils the American flag and Bald eagle in his sleep (he taped pictures of them on the ceiling of our bedroom to remind him of "what's important at all times".) He tries to keep it on the DL for security reasons, but I know the truth. It's been hell keeping this secret all these years, so it is SUCH a relief to FINALLY have someone else see through him like you do. So hats off to you, my friend. Keep on keepin' it real. Peace out.)
Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 | 01:19 am (UTC)
Anyone who supports ANY form of government is a statist. The very existence of government comes from theft. And we all know Steve just loves to use the power of the state to steal wealth from people for things he agrees with.
Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 | 01:28 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I'm always using the power of the state for all kinds of things. Not just stealing from people for my own personal pet projects, but for pretty much everything else I need it for.

Why just the other day I was sitting around at Waffle House with my friend Carlos, the administrator of the North American Union's slave labor camp at Site R, when I realized I didn't have any cash on me to leave a tip. So I got on my portable satellite phone (the kind they let all of us government propaganda agents have for free on the tax-payers' dime) and had an IRS collection agent stop off and rob a few destitute single mothers at gun-point to get me some tip money.

At first I was troubled by what I had done, using the power of the state in such a selfish way . . . but she was such a good waitress, and she deserved a tip. Plus, as Carlos reminded me, it's not going to matter in a few weeks, anyway. Project Sisyphus is almost online.
Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 | 08:05 pm (UTC)
Your attempt at humor is lame at best. You are all for having the state steal money to finance things like NASA and universal "health" care, and all the other thieving things your "hero" Obama is for. You are too much of a coward to steal yourself, so you vote and support others to do it in your stead.
Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 | 09:18 pm (UTC)
That could be it. Or it could be that I don't consider taxation by an elected representative government to be theft.
Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 | 10:26 pm (UTC)
A duck is a duck, no matter what you call it. Taxation is sure not voluntary. In other words, the government has to use force (which they have many times) or the threat of force. You support that and are nothing more than a common thief.
Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 | 10:38 pm (UTC)
I notice you don't draw a distinction between supporting something and doing something. I don't object to the concept of taxation by a democratic government, therefore in your mind I'm a thief, even though my definition of "thief" is very different than yours, and — most importantly — I haven't actually stolen anything. In fact, as a taxpayer I have been stolen from, according to your philosophy.

You also said in another comment (at least I'm assuming it was you) that anyone who supports government taxation, or theft as you call it, should hang from a rope. Anyone who supports it, not anyone who engages in it.

So we shouldn't collect taxes, but we should execute people who have committed no crimes because they advocate the wrong thing? That's one hell of a society you're proposing.

Edited at 2008-07-09 10:38 pm (UTC)
Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 | 11:40 pm (UTC)
So if we can just get over 50% of the people to agree to theft, that is a good thing?

In other words, yes, if you vote for someone who will steal from others you are just as guilty.

No matter how you dance around this issue, you support theft. Forcing others to give money is theft, plain and simple. A free society would not tolerate such things, as the thief would be shot of hung.
Thursday, July 10th, 2008 | 01:36 pm (UTC)
A free society would not tolerate such things, as the thief would be shot or hung.

Let me try to put this together. You don't approve of governments, especially those that tax their citizens to fund their operations, but you advocate the death penalty for theft, and for agreeing with theft even if one hasn't actually stolen anything oneself.

But since there is no government in your hypothetical society, who will decide the guilt or innocence of those accused of these crimes? Will there be any due process at all, any attempt at sober justice, or only the knee-jerk response driven by the passion of those wronged by the crime? Do you imagine we would be better off if the United States in 2008 was closer to the mythical vision of the Old West we see in movies and cowboy literature?

A thousand Dodge Cities with a collective population of over 300,000,000. That doesn't strike me as a good idea. Plus, I'm pretty sure even those wild, wild west towns had elected governments. If you want a society where the people are free and their rights are protected from those who would violate them, you must have a government of some kind.

Piss and moan about having to pay your taxes all you want; the federal government is a necessary evil, and I only call it evil because of how corrupt and disconnected from the people it's become. It need not be evil, or even all that bad.

It can be a lot better than it is, it needs massive reform, and I believe it can be reformed, but we need it there — to legislate, to adjudicate, to negotiate with the international community — and to keep mobs of pissed-off vigilantes from dragging every person guilty of a minor infraction (or perceived infraction) out into the street to be lynched. That isn't something a free society would tolerate.
This page was loaded Mar 25th 2019, 9:46 am GMT.