Log in

No account? Create an account
Steve Likes to Curse
Writing, comics and random thoughts from really a rather vulgar man
Kooky healthcare reform myths debunked 
Sunday, August 23rd, 2009 | 02:23 pm [glenn beck, politics]
Steve's New Userpic

I’m afraid this might wind up being for nothing, since the air seems to have gone out of the push for healthcare reform. The shit-stirrers on right-wing radio, with an assist from their darling, the thing from Alaska, Sarah Palin, have succeeded in severely hobbling the Obama administration’s effort at tentative, inadequate reform of the health insurance system, if not outright killing it. Which is a shame, I think. The bill everyone’s been fighting over this month doesn’t strike me as much of an improvement to what we’ve got now, but it would have been better than nothing, and perhaps a first step toward greater change. What’s worse, it’s been all but defeated in the public debate not on its actual merits and shortcomings, but on myths, willful distortions, and outright lies on the part of its opponents — Palin’s delusional Facebook rant about not wanting her son Trig, who has Down Syndrome, to have to face “death panels” under the proposed Obama plan being the prime example.


Media Matters for America, the organization that monitors political media and generally advocates progressive causes (they’re the outfit Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck and Mark Levin are always calling crooks and liars and traitors for tracking and publicizing the various outrageous things they do and say on a sometimes daily basis), put together a lengthy article that lists and debunks many of the myths about the current healthcare reform effort propagated by the conservative wind machine. I’ve quoted a few of the more interesting passages, but please take a minute and read the article in its entirety, especially if you find yourself leaning against the proposed reforms. I know many conservative folks may have an automatic distrust of Media Matters because it’s a leftist organization, but read the article and let the scrupulously annotated facts speak for themselves.


MYTH 1: There is no health care crisis


CLAIM: The health care system currently works fine, and only a purportedly small number of uninsured people would benefit from reform.


·        RUSH LIMBAUGH: “There really isn’t a crisis in health care in this country. The crisis in health care that -- if you wanna say, that does exist -- is the fear that a major illness or catastrophe could wipe you out, which isn’t gonna change. In fact, the odds of you being wiped out by a catastrophe or accident once the government gets started running this stuff is greater than if the private sector -- but day-to-day, there’s no health care crisis in this country. You can get it. So, it isn’t about health care, per se. This is just about gaining control, taking money, and controlling people’s lives, and wiping out Republicans -- a nice cherry on top.” [Premiere Radio Networks’ The Rush Limbaugh Show, 6/18/09]


·        STEVE DOOCY: “Currently, 90 percent of all Americans have got some sort of health care coverage, which means they are effectively blowing up the system for 5 percent. Now, the 5 percent, you gotta worry about them -- you gotta worry about everybody who doesn’t have it. But is it worth all of this for 5 percent?” [Fox News’ Fox & Friends, 7/30/09]


REALITY: Roughly 25 million Americans were underinsured in 2007. According to Cathy Schoen, senior vice president of The Commonwealth Fund, “From 2003 to 2007, the number of adults who were insured all year but were underinsured increased by 60 percent. Based on those who incur high out-of-pocket costs relative to their income not counting premiums despite having coverage all year, an estimated 25 million adults under age 65 were underinsured in 2007.” [Testimony from Schoen before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, 2/24/09]


The underinsured do not receive adequate care and face financial hardship. Schoen explained that the “experiences” of the underinsured were “similar” to those of the uninsured, noting that “over half of the underinsured and two thirds of the uninsured went without recommended treatment, follow-up care, medications or did not see a doctor when sick. Half of both groups faced financial stress, including medical debt.” [Schoen testimony, 2/24/09]


Insurance companies currently rescind policies when their insured customers need treatment. Insurance companies restrict or deny coverage by rescinding health insurance policies on the grounds that customers had undisclosed pre-existing conditions. On June 16, a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee held a hearing exploring this practice, with the goal of examining “the practice of ‘post-claims underwriting,’ which occurs when insurance companies cancel individual health insurance policies after providers submit claims for medical services rendered.” The committee also released a memorandum finding that three major American insurance companies rescinded 19,776 policies for over $300 million in savings over five years and that even that number “significantly undercounts the total number of rescissions” by the companies.


Currently, insurance companies deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions. CNN senior medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen wrote in a May 14 CNN.com article, “According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 21 percent of people who apply for health insurance on their own get turned down, charged a higher price or offered a plan that excludes coverage for their pre-existing condition. ... The health insurance industry doesn’t deny that people are rejected or charged higher premiums because of pre-existing conditions.”



MYTH 2: Health care reform will impose rationing


CLAIM: Progressive health care reform proposals will introduce a system of “rationing” into American medicine.


·        SEAN HANNITY: “We’re gonna have a government rationing body that tells women with breast cancer, ‘You’re dead.’ It’s a death sentence.” [Fox News’ Hannity, 6/19/09]

·        MICHELLE MALKIN: “Big Nanny Democrats want to ration health care for everyone in America -- except those who break our immigration laws.” [Malkin column, 7/22/09]


REALITY: Insurance companies already ration care. Insurance companies acknowledge that they ration care, restricting coverage of procedures and tests like MRIs and CAT scans and denying coverage for pre-existing medical conditions.


Sanjay Gupta: “I can tell you, as a practicing physician ... who deals with this on a daily basis, rationing does occur all the time.” As Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN’s chief medical correspondent, explained: “[P]eople always say, ‘Is there going to be rationed care?’ And I can tell you, as a practicing physician, as someone who deals with this on a daily basis, rationing does occur all the time. I mean, I was in the clinic this past week. And I -- you know, at the end of clinic, I get all this paperwork that basically says, ‘Justify why you’re doing such and such procedure. Justify why you’re ordering such and such test.’ And if the justification is inadequate, the answer comes back, ‘Well, that’s not going to be covered.’ Which basically is saying that the patient is going to have to pay for it on their own, which is, in essence, is what rationing is, in so many ways.” [CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360, 8/12/09]


Insurance companies ration care by rescinding coverage. As former senior executive at CIGNA health insurance company Wendell Potter explained in June 24 Senate testimony, insurance companies restrict or deny coverage by rescinding health insurance policies on the grounds that people had undisclosed pre-existing conditions. President Obama recently cited one such example, noting that “[a] woman from Texas was diagnosed with an aggressive form of breast cancer, was scheduled for a double mastectomy. Three days before surgery ... the insurance company canceled the policy, in part because she forgot to declare a case of acne. ... By the time she had her insurance reinstated, the cancer had more than doubled in size.”



MYTH 3: Health care reform provides for euthanasia, “death panel”


CLAIM: House health care reform bill mandates end-of-life counseling that will pressure seniors to end their lives.


·        BETSY McCAUGHEY: “And one of the most shocking things I found in this bill, and there were many, is on Page 425, where the Congress would make it mandatory -- absolutely require -- that every five years, people in Medicare have a required counseling session that will tell them how to end their life sooner, how to decline nutrition, how to decline being hydrated, how to go in to hospice care. And by the way, the bill expressly says that if you get sick somewhere in that five-year period -- if you get a cancer diagnosis, for example -- you have to go through that session again. All to do what’s in society’s best interest or your family’s best interest and cut your life short. These are such sacred issues of life and death. Government should have nothing to do with this.” [FredThompsonShow.com, interview archives, 7/16/09]

·        HANNITY: “Now, she [McCaughey] actually uncovered in this bill a particularly outrageous provision -- and by the way, there will be more to come in the Obamacare plan. According to McCaughey, she’s saying under the House provision and the House version, perfectly healthy senior citizens are going to be forced to undergo, quote, ‘end of life counseling,’ apparently to encourage them to check out before their time is up.” [ABC Radio Networks and Premiere Radio Networks’ The Sean Hannity Show, 7/17/09]


REALITY: Advance care planning is not mandatory in the House health care bill. Section 1233 of America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 -- which includes “Page 425” -- amends the Social Security Act to ensure that advance care planning will be covered if a patient requests it from a qualified care provider [America’s Affordable Health Choices Act, Sec. 1233]. According to an analysis of the bill produced by the three relevant House committees, the section “[p]rovides coverage for consultation between enrollees and practitioners to discuss orders for life-sustaining treatment. Instructs CMS to modify ‘Medicare & You’ handbook to incorporate information on end-of-life planning resources and to incorporate measures on advance care planning into the physician’s quality reporting initiative.” [waysandmeans.house.gov, accessed 7/29/09]


PolitiFact: McCaughey’s claim that seniors would be encouraged to end their lives “is an outright distortion.” “McCaughey incorrectly states that the bill would require Medicare patients to have these counseling sessions and she is suggesting that the government is somehow trying to interfere with a very personal decision. And her claim that the sessions would ‘tell [seniors] how to end their life sooner’ is an outright distortion. Rather, the sessions are an option for elderly patients who want to learn more about living wills, health care proxies and other forms of end-of-life planning. McCaughey isn’t just wrong, she’s spreading a ridiculous falsehood.” [PolitiFact.com, 7/23/09]


CLAIM: Health care reform would establish a “death panel.”


·        GLENN BECK: “So, why is there no more discussion than there is on Sarah Palin and what she said over the weekend that there would be ... [a] death panel for her son Trig? That’s quite a statement. I believe it to be true, but that’s quite a statement.” [Premiere Radio Networks’ The Glenn Beck Program, 8/10/09]

·        BRIAN KILMEADE: “[E]veryone’s talking about seniors, and they’re talking about the middle class and affordable health care. If the upper class is paying for the next two classes, and are seniors going to be in front of a death panel? And then just as you think, ‘OK, that’s ridiculous,’ then you realize there’s provisions in there that seniors in the last lap of their life will be sitting there going to a panel, possibly discussing what the best thing for them is.” [Fox & Friends, 8/10/09]


REALITY: “Death panel” claims have been conclusively discredited. In one of more than 40 media reports debunking claims of euthanasia and “death panels,” PolitiFact wrote: “We’ve looked at the inflammatory claims that the health care bill encourages euthanasia. It doesn’t. There’s certainly no ‘death board’ that determines the worthiness of individuals to receive care. ... [Palin] said that the Democratic plan will ration care and ‘my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health care.’ Palin’s statement sounds more like a science fiction movie (Soylent Green, anyone?) than part of an actual bill before Congress. We rate her statement Pants on Fire!” [PolitiFact.com, 8/10/09]


And those are just the first three. The article contains a total of 14 myths and falsehoods about healthcare reform, all of which are refuted by the facts, and by taking a closer look at some of the arguments. Check it out — and if it makes sense to you, pass it on.

Sunday, August 23rd, 2009 | 10:22 pm (UTC) - Who's Killing Health Caare Reform
I'm sure you viewed Olbermann's Special Comment where he showed various Representatives from both political parties and the amounts of money they received from health insurance companies. If so, you know why the hea;th care bill will be stripped of the public option and why a single-payer plan was never even entered into discussion.

The Democrats have eough of a majority to pass a bill without a singl Republican vote. The objections of Republicans and pundits are irrelevant. As usual, the corrupting influence of private money contributed to public officials' election coffers has already determined the dismal outcome.
Monday, August 24th, 2009 | 01:23 pm (UTC) - Re: Who's Killing Health Caare Reform
I understand and support the president's desire to make healthcare reform a bipartisan effort (though non-partisan is always better), but I agree that when this attempt at reform fails, the Democrats in Congress will ultimately have no one to blame but themselves.

And I don't blame only the money from special interests — though obviously that is a huge part of the problem. I blame political ambition, too. Senators and Congresspeople look at what they do as a career, and they don't want to risk losing their jobs by voting for a potentially very unpopular bill. That's how it is, and precisely how it shouldn't be. That's why term limits are such a necessary reform. These guys and gals shouldn't be worried about whether or not they can get re-elected. They should be doing what's right for the people, not for their political careers.
Monday, August 24th, 2009 | 06:09 am (UTC)
Yeah, no. The queezy feeling I get when I consider this whole health care thing has nothing to do with not understanding it, (in other words, the gotta hurl chunks feeling has nothing to do with "myths" or being mislead by talk radio, for god's sake.) You guys really underestimate people with differing views than your own. They're smarter than you think.

I want better health care just as much as the next guy, I know the system is messed up. But, I oppose the whole health care reform business right now, because simply...now is not the right time. The economy stinks, it's our first priority. That and the deficit. If we could erase the stimulus, the bank bail outs, the cap and trade, the under-the-table dealings with PHARMA, then...maybe...maybe...health care reform could be a consideration during this economic downturn. But considering the severity of the global economic all-around shitty-ness, I say, "No thanks on the health care, really, just give me some reasurrance that I'll have a job come next year, please." The electric company already wants to raise my rates by 30%, what's all this extra being healthy crap gonna cost me?

The whole "urgency of now" thing is really coming across as pushy salesmanship. It has a way of making a person dig in their heals, trust their gut, and walk away.

Read Peggy Noonan. Because I think she better expresses how most opponents of health care are feeling, lately.

You might agree with Keith Olbermann about many things, but that doesn't mean you don't have a mind of your own, and it works the same way on the other side. Rush limbaugh and Sarah Palin do not speak for me.

Monday, August 24th, 2009 | 01:16 pm (UTC)
Believe me, I know that Limbaugh and Palin et al don't speak for their side. It's just that I have to remind myself of that (or have people like you, who are kind enough to comment, do it for me), because the rational, intelligent voices from the other side are being drowned out by the nuts and the bullies.

I agree with you on the false urgency of the issue. I believe there is a healthcare crisis, I believe millions of people are being poorly served by the current system, and that it must be changed. But I also recognize that things have been like this for . . . shit, as long as I can remember, and if we are to undertake sweeping change, it should 1) be just that: sweeping, significant change, not just a few tweeks to the current system; and 2) be structured well enough that it's done right the first time. Rushing into things won't help anyone.

All that being said, I still think the bills currently up for debate would be marginal improvements over what we have now. But I do wish we were arguing over something a bit more significant.

I don't make it a habit to read Peggy Noonan, but I do try to keep up with Thomas Sowell and George Will, and regular readers of this blog will know of my well documented hard-on for David Frum. It's not that I don't know there are voices on the right worth listening to. It's just that they're hard to hear.

All sides of the political universe tend to be drowned out by the kooks, and that's a shame. It leaves the rest of us poorly served indeed.
This page was loaded Jul 18th 2018, 5:03 am GMT.